Skip to main content

Abu Azmi: The Distraction

Yes. What Abu Azmi said is disgusting.

It reeks of the patriarchal baggage that India carries; which allows men to believe that they can dictate the rules of conduct for women.

It is a statement that mirrors an archaic value system that remains a large collective mindset.
It uses the oft-abused crutch of culture to make an argument.

Culture, by definition, is - “arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively”. The key word here is collective.

Culture belongs to no single individual and secondly, is a shifting goalpost. Today’s culture is reflection of today’s times and not a slave of the past.

So the so called prophets quoting culture are doing so, without an understanding of the word. What they refer to is actually tradition, which again is a counterpoint to “modern”.

Hence in the very statement made by Abu Azmi; he made two things clear – that is does not understand culture and is a traditional relic.

Making both him and his comment irrelevant.

He and his comment are nothing but a distraction. They shift the conversation from the only thing that we should be up in arms about - nabbing each of those cowardly culprits who took the support of a herd to grope women.

Media, which is an influencer and mirror of social conversations, is spending more time on the comment than on the job of investigating and helping law makers nab the molesters.

And people like us, me and social influencers are condemning the comment more than the act.

A lot of anger is needed but let’s channelize it on the act of molestation rather than around a stupid comment made by an irrelevant politician.

After all, he is a guy who believes that women should also be jailed if they are raped. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Punish-women-too-in-rape-cases-SP-leader-Abu-Azmi/articleshow/33625145.cms)


Ignorance as a statement of the person’s irrelevance is the best response to Abu Azmi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revolution 2020 - The Alternate Ending

Chapter 42 On March 1, I worked a lot harder than I normally do. I went through the mid-term results that Dean Srivastava brought over. I met with Bedi to discuss plans for the institution moving into engineering and MBA. I met with every student; every staff member who knocked on my door. I did everything to not look at that one card that Raghav had sent through in my mail a week back. But I couldn’t avoid it. Every 10 minutes; my eyes automatically glanced at it. And none of what anyone said registered in my head. The message on the card just kept coming back to me Mrs and Mr Anil Kashyap Invite the pleasure of your company For the wedding of their beloved son Raghav With Aarti (D/O Mrs and Mr Pratap Brij Pradhan, DM) At 8 p.m. On March 1, 2010 Poolside Lawns Taj Ganga, Varanasi I scheduled a visit to Shuklaji that evening. It was my way of ensuring that I wouldn’t be tempted to land up at the Taj Ganga. God knows I did!! I wanted ...

Sunday Morning Musings: "Cannes" the Journey Have Been Better?

Having just returned from the French Riviera, I have no intention of adding to the already exhausted chorus of post-Cannes euphoria or critique. Instead, staying true to my passion with the evolution of words , I have chosen to look at Cannes through a historical lens to trace how a modest gathering of cinema publicists transformed into a sun-kissed show of global capitalism. I. The Venetian Genesis and the Moving Image (1954–1983) The roots of the festival originate in the post-World War II media landscape, specifically within the domain of cinema screen advertising. The 1954 Inauguration: A group of international cinema screen advertising contractors belonging to the Screen Advertising World Association (SAWA) organized the inaugural International Advertising Film Festival in Venice, Italy. The Search for Validation: Inspired by the rapid rise of the Cannes Film Festival, SAWA sought a parallel platform. They believed that those who created commercial films deserved the same artis...

Willow vs. Warheads - 40 years of geopolitical theatre on a cricket field.

For the last one week, I and few million cricket fans have been waiting in anticipation for this India Pakistan world T20 clash. While this has always been the pinnacle of excitement for fanatics on both sides of the border, the recent geo political tensions have added uncertainty, trepidation and bite to an already tense on-field enmity. It was this context that got me thinking about the progress (or lack of it) of this spectacular rivalry over the last 40 years. Decade Focus Statistical Trend Political Environment 1980s Sharjah Dominance Pakistan Advantage Brasstacks & Zia Diplomacy 1990s World Cup & Neutrality Pakistan (ODI) / India (WC) Kargil & Nuclear Tests 2000s Friendship & Rupture Parity / India Growth 2004 Tour to 2008 Attacks 2010s Isolation & ICC Dominance India Dominance...