Skip to main content

THE CONVENIENT SUSPENSION OF PRINCIPLES FOR AN UBER DISCOUNT

I have a moral disagreement with gender discrimination.

I have a deep hatred for any person or corporation whose employees ill treat women in any way.
I have huge respect for people who choose to make a living through ethical means. And by association, a dislike for people who make money through unethical business practices.

And like any sensible law-abiding citizen, I would have no association with a murderer.

And yet, using Uber has become second nature.

And watching Salman Khan flicks doesn’t bring with it a sense of guilt.

I would never be-friend an Uber if he was a person. Imagine hanging out with a person who thinks of women as unequal, turns a blind eye towards molestation in his family and who is known to be manipulative in his professional dealings.

You’d stay as far as possible for this person.

As you would if the person was accused of killing 7 people and routinely beating up his girlfriends.
But we’re more than happy to give them our money and our time.

Why do I (and many of us, I assume) conveniently twist my rigid principles for a $2 saving on an Uber ride or 2 works of fun in the cinema?

Why is the price of my morality less than the price of an Uber discount?

Because I can hide behind the comfortable excuse of insignificance. And the convenient truth about degrees of separation.

Comfortable excuse of insignificance – “What will the loss of my few hundred dollars make to Uber? They make billions and will continue doing so.”

Convenient truth about degrees of separation – “It’s not like I am being friends with Salman personally. I never will. I am just watching his movie.”

The inconvenient truth is – We (read I) are selfish, materialistic human beings. The everyday convenience of an Uber ride and the 2 hours of escape a Salman flick provide are guilty pleasures we are just not willing to give up.

It’s why Uber will never lose people like us on ethical grounds. There will be an insignificant few with a strong moral spine who can and will boycott an Uber.

But just like the elections, these noble few are too small in number to matter to either Uber or Salman.

I am neither forgiving not forgetful.

I am just needy.

I am just “BEING HUMAN”.

Unfortunately for me, Salman Khan knows this only too well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revolution 2020 - The Alternate Ending

Chapter 42 On March 1, I worked a lot harder than I normally do. I went through the mid-term results that Dean Srivastava brought over. I met with Bedi to discuss plans for the institution moving into engineering and MBA. I met with every student; every staff member who knocked on my door. I did everything to not look at that one card that Raghav had sent through in my mail a week back. But I couldn’t avoid it. Every 10 minutes; my eyes automatically glanced at it. And none of what anyone said registered in my head. The message on the card just kept coming back to me Mrs and Mr Anil Kashyap Invite the pleasure of your company For the wedding of their beloved son Raghav With Aarti (D/O Mrs and Mr Pratap Brij Pradhan, DM) At 8 p.m. On March 1, 2010 Poolside Lawns Taj Ganga, Varanasi I scheduled a visit to Shuklaji that evening. It was my way of ensuring that I wouldn’t be tempted to land up at the Taj Ganga. God knows I did!! I wanted ...

Sunday Morning Musings: "Cannes" the Journey Have Been Better?

Having just returned from the French Riviera, I have no intention of adding to the already exhausted chorus of post-Cannes euphoria or critique. Instead, staying true to my passion with the evolution of words , I have chosen to look at Cannes through a historical lens to trace how a modest gathering of cinema publicists transformed into a sun-kissed show of global capitalism. I. The Venetian Genesis and the Moving Image (1954–1983) The roots of the festival originate in the post-World War II media landscape, specifically within the domain of cinema screen advertising. The 1954 Inauguration: A group of international cinema screen advertising contractors belonging to the Screen Advertising World Association (SAWA) organized the inaugural International Advertising Film Festival in Venice, Italy. The Search for Validation: Inspired by the rapid rise of the Cannes Film Festival, SAWA sought a parallel platform. They believed that those who created commercial films deserved the same artis...

Willow vs. Warheads - 40 years of geopolitical theatre on a cricket field.

For the last one week, I and few million cricket fans have been waiting in anticipation for this India Pakistan world T20 clash. While this has always been the pinnacle of excitement for fanatics on both sides of the border, the recent geo political tensions have added uncertainty, trepidation and bite to an already tense on-field enmity. It was this context that got me thinking about the progress (or lack of it) of this spectacular rivalry over the last 40 years. Decade Focus Statistical Trend Political Environment 1980s Sharjah Dominance Pakistan Advantage Brasstacks & Zia Diplomacy 1990s World Cup & Neutrality Pakistan (ODI) / India (WC) Kargil & Nuclear Tests 2000s Friendship & Rupture Parity / India Growth 2004 Tour to 2008 Attacks 2010s Isolation & ICC Dominance India Dominance...